Benchmarking Metric Ground Navigation
August 31, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Daniel Perille, Abigail Truong, Xuesu Xiao, Peter Stone
arXiv ID
2008.13315
Category
cs.RO: Robotics
Cross-listed
eess.SP
Citations
85
Venue
IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Metric ground navigation addresses the problem of autonomously moving a robot from one point to another in an obstacle-occupied planar environment in a collision-free manner. It is one of the most fundamental capabilities of intelligent mobile robots. This paper presents a standardized testbed with a set of environments and metrics to benchmark difficulty of different scenarios and performance of different systems of metric ground navigation. Current benchmarks focus on individual components of mobile robot navigation, such as perception and state estimation, but the navigation performance as a whole is rarely measured in a systematic and standardized fashion. As a result, navigation systems are usually tested and compared in an ad hoc manner, such as in one or two manually chosen environments. The introduced benchmark provides a general testbed for ground robot navigation in a metric world. The Benchmark for Autonomous Robot Navigation (BARN) dataset includes 300 navigation environments, which are ordered by a set of difficulty metrics. Navigation performance can be tested and compared in those environments in a systematic and objective fashion. This benchmark can be used to predict navigation difficulty of a new environment, compare navigation systems, and potentially serve as a cost function and a curriculum for planning-based and learning-based navigation systems. We have published our dataset and the source code to generate datasets for different robot footprints at www.cs.utexas.edu/~xiao/BARN/BARN.html.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Robotics
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehicles
π
π
The Cartographer
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted