Precise Repositioning of Robotic Ultrasound: Improving Registration-based Motion Compensation using Ultrasound Confidence Optimization

August 10, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zhongliang Jiang, Nehil Danis, Yuan Bi, Mingchuan Zhou, Markus Kroenke, Thomas Wendler, Nassir Navab arXiv ID 2208.05383 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed eess.SY Citations 47 Venue IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Robotic ultrasound (US) imaging has been seen as a promising solution to overcome the limitations of free-hand US examinations, i.e., inter-operator variability. However, the fact that robotic US systems cannot react to subject movements during scans limits their clinical acceptance. Regarding human sonographers, they often react to patient movements by repositioning the probe or even restarting the acquisition, in particular for the scans of anatomies with long structures like limb arteries. To realize this characteristic, we proposed a vision-based system to monitor the subject's movement and automatically update the scan trajectory thus seamlessly obtaining a complete 3D image of the target anatomy. The motion monitoring module is developed using the segmented object masks from RGB images. Once the subject is moved, the robot will stop and recompute a suitable trajectory by registering the surface point clouds of the object obtained before and after the movement using the iterative closest point algorithm. Afterward, to ensure optimal contact conditions after repositioning US probe, a confidence-based fine-tuning process is used to avoid potential gaps between the probe and contact surface. Finally, the whole system is validated on a human-like arm phantom with an uneven surface, while the object segmentation network is also validated on volunteers. The results demonstrate that the presented system can react to object movements and reliably provide accurate 3D images.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted