Learning Bimanual Scooping Policies for Food Acquisition

November 26, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Conference on Robot Learning

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jennifer Grannen, Yilin Wu, Suneel Belkhale, Dorsa Sadigh arXiv ID 2211.14652 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 47 Venue Conference on Robot Learning Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
A robotic feeding system must be able to acquire a variety of foods. Prior bite acquisition works consider single-arm spoon scooping or fork skewering, which do not generalize to foods with complex geometries and deformabilities. For example, when acquiring a group of peas, skewering could smoosh the peas while scooping without a barrier could result in chasing the peas on the plate. In order to acquire foods with such diverse properties, we propose stabilizing food items during scooping using a second arm, for example, by pushing peas against the spoon with a flat surface to prevent dispersion. The added stabilizing arm can lead to new challenges. Critically, this arm should stabilize the food scene without interfering with the acquisition motion, which is especially difficult for easily breakable high-risk food items like tofu. These high-risk foods can break between the pusher and spoon during scooping, which can lead to food waste falling out of the spoon. We propose a general bimanual scooping primitive and an adaptive stabilization strategy that enables successful acquisition of a diverse set of food geometries and physical properties. Our approach, CARBS: Coordinated Acquisition with Reactive Bimanual Scooping, learns to stabilize without impeding task progress by identifying high-risk foods and robustly scooping them using closed-loop visual feedback. We find that CARBS is able to generalize across food shape, size, and deformability and is additionally able to manipulate multiple food items simultaneously. CARBS achieves 87.0% success on scooping rigid foods, which is 25.8% more successful than a single-arm baseline, and reduces food breakage by 16.2% compared to an analytical baseline. Videos can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/bimanualscoop-corl22/home .
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Robotics

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted