The Value of Privacy: Strategic Data Subjects, Incentive Mechanisms and Fundamental Limits
March 22, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Weina Wang, Lei Ying, Junshan Zhang
arXiv ID
1603.06870
Category
cs.GT: Game Theory
Cross-listed
cs.CR
Citations
67
Venue
Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We study the value of data privacy in a game-theoretic model of trading private data, where a data collector purchases private data from strategic data subjects (individuals) through an incentive mechanism. The private data of each individual represents her knowledge about an underlying state, which is the information that the data collector desires to learn. Different from most of the existing work on privacy-aware surveys, our model does not assume the data collector to be trustworthy. Then, an individual takes full control of its own data privacy and reports only a privacy-preserving version of her data. In this paper, the value of $Ξ΅$ units of privacy is measured by the minimum payment of all nonnegative payment mechanisms, under which an individual's best response at a Nash equilibrium is to report the data with a privacy level of $Ξ΅$. The higher $Ξ΅$ is, the less private the reported data is. We derive lower and upper bounds on the value of privacy which are asymptotically tight as the number of data subjects becomes large. Specifically, the lower bound assures that it is impossible to use less amount of payment to buy $Ξ΅$ units of privacy, and the upper bound is given by an achievable payment mechanism that we designed. Based on these fundamental limits, we further derive lower and upper bounds on the minimum total payment for the data collector to achieve a given learning accuracy target, and show that the total payment of the designed mechanism is at most one individual's payment away from the minimum.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Game Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Motivational Game-Theoretic Approach for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in the Smart Grid
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computing Resource Allocation in Three-Tier IoT Fog Networks: a Joint Optimization Approach Combining Stackelberg Game and Matching
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Games
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computation Peer Offloading for Energy-Constrained Mobile Edge Computing in Small-Cell Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Blockchain Mining Games
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted