Two-sided Matching Based Cooperative Spectrum Sharing
April 13, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Lin Gao, Lingjie Duan, Jianwei Huang
arXiv ID
1604.03764
Category
cs.GT: Game Theory
Cross-listed
cs.IT,
cs.NI
Citations
50
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Dynamic spectrum access (DSA) can effectively improve the spectrum efficiency and alleviate the spectrum scarcity, by allowing unlicensed secondary users (SUs) to access the licensed spectrum of primary users (PUs) opportunistically. Cooperative spectrum sharing is a new promising paradigm to provide necessary incentives for both PUs and SUs in dynamic spectrum access. The key idea is that SUs relay the traffic of PUs in exchange for the access time on the PUs' licensed spectrum. In this paper, we formulate the cooperative spectrum sharing between multiple PUs and multiple SUs as a two-sided market, and study the market equilibrium under both complete and incomplete information. First, we characterize the sufficient and necessary conditions for the market equilibrium. We analytically show that there may exist multiple market equilibria, among which there is always a unique Pareto-optimal equilibrium for PUs (called PU-Optimal-EQ), in which every PU achieves a utility no worse than in any other equilibrium. Then, we show that under complete information, the unique Pareto-optimal equilibrium PU-Optimal-EQ can always be achieved despite the competition among PUs; whereas, under incomplete information, the PU-Optimal-EQ may not be achieved due to the mis-representations of SUs (in reporting their private information). Regarding this, we further study the worse-case equilibrium for PUs, and characterize a Robust equilibrium for PUs (called PU-Robust-EQ), which provides every PU a guaranteed utility under all possible mis-representation behaviors of SUs. Numerical results show that in a typical network where the number of PUs and SUs are different, the performance gap between PU-Optimal-EQ and PU-Robust-EQ is quite small (e.g., less than 10% in the simulations).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Game Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Motivational Game-Theoretic Approach for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in the Smart Grid
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computing Resource Allocation in Three-Tier IoT Fog Networks: a Joint Optimization Approach Combining Stackelberg Game and Matching
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Games
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computation Peer Offloading for Energy-Constrained Mobile Edge Computing in Small-Cell Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Blockchain Mining Games
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted