Dynamic Bayesian Games for Adversarial and Defensive Cyber Deception

September 06, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Autonomous Cyber Deception

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Linan Huang, Quanyan Zhu arXiv ID 1809.02013 Category cs.GT: Game Theory Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 43 Venue Autonomous Cyber Deception Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Security challenges accompany the efficiency. The pervasive integration of information and communications technologies (ICTs) makes cyber-physical systems vulnerable to targeted attacks that are deceptive, persistent, adaptive and strategic. Attack instances such as Stuxnet, Dyn, and WannaCry ransomware have shown the insufficiency of off-the-shelf defensive methods including the firewall and intrusion detection systems. Hence, it is essential to design up-to-date security mechanisms that can mitigate the risks despite the successful infiltration and the strategic response of sophisticated attackers. In this chapter, we use game theory to model competitive interactions between defenders and attackers. First, we use the static Bayesian game to capture the stealthy and deceptive characteristics of the attacker. A random variable called the \textit{type} characterizes users' essences and objectives, e.g., a legitimate user or an attacker. The realization of the user's type is private information due to the cyber deception. Then, we extend the one-shot simultaneous interaction into the one-shot interaction with asymmetric information structure, i.e., the signaling game. Finally, we investigate the multi-stage transition under a case study of Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) and Tennessee Eastman (TE) process. Two-Sided incomplete information is introduced because the defender can adopt defensive deception techniques such as honey files and honeypots to create sufficient amount of uncertainties for the attacker. Throughout this chapter, the analysis of the Nash equilibrium (NE), Bayesian Nash equilibrium (BNE), and perfect Bayesian Nash equilibrium (PBNE) enables the policy prediction of the adversary and the design of proactive and strategic defenses to deter attackers and mitigate losses.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Game Theory

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Blockchain Mining Games

Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, ... (+2 more)

cs.GT πŸ› EC πŸ“š 273 cites 10 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted